Grazing rate and feeding selectivity of small and large bodied cladocerans in waters from lakes with different salinity and phytoplankton structure -- Journal of Oceanology and Limnology,2023,41(4):1341-1351

	Cite this paper:
	Egor ZADEREEV, Tatiana LOPATINA, Svyatoslav OVCHINNIKOV, Alexander TOLOMEEV. Grazing rate and feeding selectivity of small and large bodied cladocerans in waters from lakes with different salinity and phytoplankton structure[J]. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2023, 41(4): 1341-1351

Grazing rate and feeding selectivity of small and large bodied cladocerans in waters from lakes with different salinity and phytoplankton structure

Egor ZADEREEV^1,2, Tatiana LOPATINA¹, Svyatoslav OVCHINNIKOV², Alexander TOLOMEEV^1,2

1 Institute of Biophysics, Krasnoyarsk Research Center, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia;
2 Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia

Abstract:

Cladocera are filter feeders abundant in freshwaters, which consume phytoplankton particles in wide size and taxonomic ranges. The ability of cladocerans to control phytoplankton abundance by grazing is determined by various factors including the characteristics of phytoplankton. Freshwater salinization may reduce the strength of top-down grazing control of phytoplankton because of the detrimental effects of salinity on the grazing intensity of zooplankters. We performed grazing experiments with two species of Cladocera of different body lengths to test their ability to graze on phytoplankton in natural waters differing in salinity and size and taxonomic composition of food particles. Grazing experiments demonstrated that the grazing rate was mostly controlled by the abundance of phytoplankton in the medium. The grazing rate was reduced at salinity ca. above 3 g/L of NaCl in the medium. The lower grazing rate was observed in the medium with larger phytoplankton particles. Both species predominantly consumed phytoplankton particles with a diameter of 6–12 µm, which may shift the size distribution of phytoplankton towards a larger average diameter of particles. The taxon-specific feeding was also observed, as both species predominantly consumed diatom algae. Thus, we found that because of grazing, the size and taxonomic characteristics of phytoplankton are shifted towards a less edible community. The detrimental effect of elevated salinity on grazing rate supports growing concern about freshwater salinization negatively affecting water quality, particularly reducing top-down grazing control of phytoplankton.

Received: 2022-02-21 Revised:

Tools

PDF (1142 KB) Free

Print this page

Add to favorites

Email this article to others

Authors

Articles by Egor ZADEREEV

Articles by Tatiana LOPATINA

Articles by Svyatoslav OVCHINNIKOV

Articles by Alexander TOLOMEEV

References:
Aladin N V. 1991. Salinity tolerance and morphology of the osmoregulation organs in Cladocera with special reference to Cladocera from the Aral Sea. Hydrobiologia, 225(1):291-299, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028407.
Baillieul M, De Wachter B, Blust R. 1998. Effect of salinity on the swimming velocity of the water flea Daphnia magna. Physiological Zoology, 71(6): 703-707, https://doi.org/10.1086/515985.
Brendelberger H. 1991. Filter mesh size of cladocerans predicts retention efficiency for bacteria. Limnology and Oceanography, 36(5): 884-894, https://doi. org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.5.0884.
Burns C W. 1968. The relationship between body size of filter-feeding cladocera and the maximum size of particle ingested. Limnology and Oceanography, 13(4): 675-678.
Chaichana R, Promwang N. 2016. Comparative study of grazing efficiency between Moina macrocopa and Branchinella thailandensis to control phytoplankton growth. Environment and Natural Resources Journal, 11(2): 28-40.
Cognetti G, Maltagliati F. 2000. Biodiversity and adaptive mechanisms in brackish water fauna. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40(1): 7-14, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X (99)00173-3.
Colina M, Calliari D, Carballo C et al. 2016. A trait-based approach to summarize zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions in freshwaters. Hydrobiologia, 767(1): 221-233, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2503-y.
Cunillera-Montcusí D, Beklioğlu M, Cañedo-Argüelles M et al. 2022. Freshwater salinisation: a research agenda for a saltier world. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 37(5): 440-453, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.12.005.
Dormann C F, Elith J, Bacher S et al. 2013. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1): 27-46, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x.
Frau D. 2022. Grazing impacts on phytoplankton in South American water ecosystems: a synthesis. Hydrobiologia, 849(4): 833-860, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04748-x.
Geller W, Müller H. 1981. The filtration apparatus of Cladocera:filter mesh-sizes and their implications on food selectivity.Oecologia, 49(3): 316-321.
Ger K A, Naus-Wiezer S, De Meester L et al. 2019.Zooplankton grazing selectivity regulates herbivory and dominance of toxic phytoplankton over multiple prey generations. Limnology and Oceanography, 64(3): 1214-1227, https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11108.
Giani A. 1991. Implications of phytoplankton chemical composition for zooplankton production: experimental evidence. Oecologia, 87(3): 409-416, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634599.
Gulati R, Demott W. 1997. The role of food quality for zooplankton: remarks on the state-of-the-art, perspectives and priorities. Freshwater Biology, 38(3): 753-768.
Gutelmaher B L. 1986. Metabolism of plankton as a whole:trophometabolic interactions of zoo- and phytoplankton.Nauka, Leningrad. V. 133, p.55-59. (in Russian)
Gutelmaher B L, Sadchikov A P, Filippova T G. 1988.Zooplankton nutrition. Results of science and technology, VINITI, Seria, ecologyGeneral, Biocenology, Hydrobiology, Moscow. V. 6, 156p. (in Russian)
Gutierrez M F, Tavşanoğlu Ü N, Vidal N et al. 2018. Salinity shapes zooplankton communities and functional diversity and has complex effects on size structure in lakes.Hydrobiologia, 813(1): 237-255, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3529-8.
Hambright K D, Zohary T, Easton J et al. 2001. Effects of zooplankton grazing and nutrients on the bloomforming, N2-fixing cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon in Lake Kinneret. Journal of Plankton Research, 23(2):165-174, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/23.2.165.
Hulot F D, Lacroix G, Loreau M. 2014. Differential responses of size-based functional groups to bottom-up and top-down perturbations in pelagic food webs: a meta-analysis. Oikos, 123(11): 1291-1300, https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01116.
Kasprzak P H, Lathrop R C. 1997. Influence of two Daphnia species on summer phytoplankton assemblages from eutrophic lakes. Journal of Plankton Research, 19(8):1025-1044, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/19.8.1025.
Kaushal S S, Likens G E, Pace M L et al. 2019. Novel ‘chemical cocktails’ in inland waters are a consequence of the freshwater salinization syndrome. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1764): 20180017, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018. 0017.
Khlebovich V V. 1969. Aspects of animal evolution related to critical salinity and internal state. Marine Biology, 2(4):338-345.
Lampert W, Fleckner W, Rai H et al. 1986. Phytoplankton control by grazing zooplankton: a study on the spring clear‐water phase. Limnology and Oceanography, 31(3):478-490, https://doi.org/10.4319/LO.1986.31.3.0478.
Lathrop R C, Carpenter S R, Robertson D M. 1999. Summer water clarity responses to phosphorus, Daphnia grazing, and internal mixing in Lake Mendota. Limnology and Oceanography, 44(1): 137-146, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1999.44.1.0137.
Leitão E, Ger K A, Panosso R. 2018. Selective grazing by a tropical copepod (Notodiaptomus iheringi) facilitates Microcystis dominance. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9:301, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00301.
Lin Q Q, Xu L, Hou J Z et al. 2017. Responses of trophic structure and zooplankton community to salinity and temperature in Tibetan lakes: implication for the effect of climate warming. Water Research, 124: 618-629, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.078.
Lopatina T, Anishchenko O, Oskina N et al. 2021. Threshold concentrations of the road salt for adverse effects on females and resting eggs of cladoceran Moina macrocopa.Aquatic Ecology, 55(1): 283-297, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-021-09830-z.
Matveev V, Matveeva L. 1997. Grazer control and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton biomass in two Australian reservoirs. Freshwater Biology, 38(1): 49-65, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00194.x.
Mitra A, Flynn K J. 2006. Promotion of harmful algal blooms by zooplankton predatory activity. Biology Letters, 2(2):194-197, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0447.
Mourelatos S, Lacroix G. 1990. In situ filtering rates of Cladocera: effect of body length, temperature, and food concentration. Limnology and Oceanography, 35(5):1101-1111, https://doi.org/10.4319/LO.1990.35.5.1101.
Póda C, Jordán F. 2020. Aquatic food web research in mesocosms: a literature survey. Journal of Limnology, 79(3):308-313, https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2020.1949.
R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
Remane A, Schlieper C. 1971. Biology of Brackish Water. 2^nd edn. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, Germany. 372p.
Rigler F H. 1961. The relation between concentration of food and feeding rate of Daphnia magna Straus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 39(6): 857-868, https://doi.org/10.1139/z61-080.
Rogozin D, Zadereev E, Prokopkin I et al. 2017. Comparative study of the stability of stratification and the food web structure in the meromictic lakes Shira and Shunet(South Siberia, Russia). In: Gulati R D, Zadereev E S, Degermendzhi A G eds. Ecology of Meromictic Lakes.Springer, Cham. p.89-124, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49143-1_5.
Roy S, Bhattacharya S, Das P et al. 2007. Interaction among non-toxic phytoplankton, toxic phytoplankton and zooplankton: inferences from field observations. Journal of Biological Physics, 33(1): 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-007-9038-z.
Ryther J H, Sanders J G. 1980. Experimental evidence of zooplankton control of the species composition and size distribution of marine phytoplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 3(4): 279-283, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps003279.
Schallenberg M, Hall C J, Burns C W. 2003. Consequences of climate-induced salinity increases on zooplankton abundance and diversity in coastal lakes. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 251: 181-189, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps251181.
Sommer U, Sommer F. 2006. Cladocerans versus copepods:the cause of contrasting top-down controls on freshwater and marine phytoplankton. Oecologia, 147(2): 183-194, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0320-0.
Sommer U, Sommer F, Santer B et al. 2001. Complementary impact of copepods and cladocerans on phytoplankton.Ecology Letters, 4(6): 545-550, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00263.x.
Sterner R W. 2009. Role of zooplankton in aquatic ecosystems. In: Likens G E ed. Encyclopedia of Inland Waters. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam. p.678-688.
Tillmanns A R, Wilson A E, Pick F R et al. 2008. Metaanalysis of cyanobacterial effects on zooplankton population growth rate: species-specific responses. Fundamental and Applied Limnology, 171(4): 285-295, https://doi.org/10.1127/1863-9135/2008/0171-0285.
Vad C F, Schneider C, Lukić D et al. 2020. Grazing resistance and poor food quality of a widespread mixotroph impair zooplankton secondary production. Oecologia, 193(2):489-502, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04677-x.
Webster K E, Peters R H. 1978. Some size-dependent inhibitions of larger cladoceran filterers in filamentous suspensions. Limnology and Oceanography, 23(6): 1238-1245, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1978.23.6.1238.
Williams W D, Boulton A J, Taaffe R G. 1990. Salinity as a determinant of salt lake fauna: a question of scale.Hydrobiologia, 197(1): 257-266, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00026955.
Wilson A E, Sarnelle O, Tillmanns A R. 2006. Effects of cyanobacterial toxicity and morphology on the population growth of freshwater zooplankton: meta-analyses of laboratory experiments. Limnology and Oceanography, 51(4): 1915-1924, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51. 4.1915.
Work K A, Havens K E. 2003. Zooplankton grazing on bacteria and cyanobacteria in a eutrophic lake. Journal of Plankton Research, 25(10): 1301-1306, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbg092.
Zadereev E, Drobotov A, Anishchenko O et al. 2022a. The structuring effects of salinity and nutrient status on zooplankton communities and trophic structure in Siberian lakes. Water, 14(9): 1468, https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091468.
Zadereev E S, Drobotov A V, Lopatina T S et al. 2021.Comparison of rapid methods used to determine the concentration, size structure and species composition of algae. Journal of Siberian Federal University.Biology, 14(1): 5-27, https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1389-0338.
Zadereev E S, Lopatina T S, Ovchinnikov S D et al. 2022b.The effect of salinity on the grazing rate and survival of Daphnia magna females adapted to different salinities.Aquatic Ecology, 56(3): 639-652, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-021-09941-7.